DISQUS

Antony Ribot · 1 year ago

It may be true that many migrate back to using the web when twitter traffic gets too high, but what about direct messaging (DM)? DM was an integral feature for my social group and I no longer know how useful twitter will be as a social tool. For me, it may just become my feed reader of sorts.

As for North America, don't twitter make money on every SMS sent over there?

nic · 1 year ago

Antony - I have heard that Twitter makes money on every SMS in North America, but I have looked around a bit and not seen an explanation of how. If you know of one...

Thanks for the comment.

Richard Edwards · 1 year ago

Like you Nic, I used Twitter via SMS extensively when it first launched, but not at all in the last 12 months. Why? Simple answer...API's. I now access/update Twitter via a variety of web based services on my PC (Netvibes, Alert Thingy...), which suits my needs fine. I am not troubled by their announcement today (although I can see why others will be!).

Mike Grenville · 1 year ago

Unlike the rest of the world, SMS users in USA and Canada are charged to 'receive' SMS. It may seem bizare but it is true. Presumably it was this daft business model that Twitter hoped to persuade the rest of the mobile world to adopt.

As well as depressing usage, the 'receiver pays' model is one that rewards spammers and one that is not going to be adopted by other mobile carriers/operators.

Sitting in their Californian bubble this seems to have escaped Twitter.

Tom · 1 year ago

Nic: Because one must pay to send AND receive SMS in the US, Twitter usage generates more text message across all the networks. The US telcos can see that they are generating lots extra revenue from consumer-sent messages, and non of it goes to Twitter. The cost of maintaining an SMS network is minimal for them at this point. Even the all-you-can-eat SMS plans generate profit on average, since very few people are doing 1000+ SMS per month.


Mike: Keep in mind that one does not get SMS spam in the US BECUASE the recipient would have to pay, and no company will convince the FCC that consumers should pay for ads.

One question about DMs? Isn't that just a standard text message? How important is it not to have the person in your phone book anyway?

mike grenville · 1 year ago

Tom - you are right that Premium Rate SMS is very tightly regulated in the USA making it very hard to launch legitimate markleting campaigns.

azeem · 1 year ago

Nic,

The guys at Zygo (who you know) are launching http://www.zygotweet.com/ which will route tweets to SMS and beyond for you. It'll be available in a few weeks. Will work in UK and most other countries.
a

Rui Nunes · 1 year ago

Hi Nic,

I see some chances to monetize Twitter, precisely with the SMS and other functionalities. If you check the recent comments on the news published in their blog, some people (a minority, of course) is opened to pay a fee for the SMS service.
So, I see some possibilities with premium services of a few paying the use of the majority of the users. Other possibility is naturally advertising, but this is a tricky subject and it needs to be carried out with finesse and extreme PR help. Some can come out as the service evolve.
I don't see a problem except for the investors to demand a more quicker cash in.
Regards,
Rui