<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Equity Kicker - Latest Comments in The power of small changes</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/</link><description>Nic Brisbourne’s view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description><atom:link href="https://theequitykicker.disqus.com/the_power_of_small_changes/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:33:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The power of small changes</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/29/the-power-of-small-changes/#comment-4456383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The meaning of subscribe has indeed changed over the last couple of years.  It has more negative connotations than positive.  Its a commitment.  Twitter has helped bring a new word/lexicon into existence that is generally comprehended and far more palatable among mainstream social networking users.  'Follow.'  No commitments, not credit card required, no misunderstanding.  This is very wise on Googles part and should help drive more activity to their &lt;a href="http://blogger.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="blogger.com"&gt;blogger.com&lt;/a&gt; property.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mark Brooks, 212-444-1636, &lt;a href="http://www.socialnetworkingwatch.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.socialnetworkingwatch.com"&gt;http://www.socialnetworking...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markbrooks</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:33:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The power of small changes</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/29/the-power-of-small-changes/#comment-4456385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;By changing error messages from "failed delivery" to much more specific messages telling the user what kind of failure it was, and why it probably happened, we actually surfaced areas of benefit that we didn't previously know about. By being specific, and using specific language, we were able to position ourselves even further ahead of competing offers. I like the follow language, because it is "collegial".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:00:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The power of small changes</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/29/the-power-of-small-changes/#comment-4456384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't this just another example of the trendy "nudge" theory of economics/human behaviour - which is currently being seized on by the Conservative Party (who incidentially are seen in the UK as being close to Google).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:54:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The power of small changes</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/29/the-power-of-small-changes/#comment-4456382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i agree, little changes like this have big impacts. a great example of this approach pushed even further is feedburner,albeit slightly too americanised for their global customer base.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nic mitham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:42:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>