<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Equity Kicker - Latest Comments in Strategy decay in the film industry</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/</link><description>Nic Brisbourne’s view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 05:05:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Strategy decay in the film industry</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/11/12/strategy-decay-in-the-film-industry/#comment-10312068</link><description>I agree</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brisbourne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 05:05:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strategy decay in the film industry</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/11/12/strategy-decay-in-the-film-industry/#comment-10305042</link><description>For me, to have a low budget doesn't mean to have a low film result. It depends upon how the whole team materialize the film and its importance to the viewing public. We have so many low budgeted films that won awards though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Slingshot</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 19:38:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strategy decay in the film industry</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/11/12/strategy-decay-in-the-film-industry/#comment-4456561</link><description>“There is no statistical correlation between stars and success,” said S. Abraham Ravid, a professor of economics and finance at Rutgers &lt;br&gt;University, who, in a 1999 study of almost 200 films released between 1991 and 1993, found that once one considered other factors influencing &lt;br&gt;the success of a film, a star had no impact on its rate of return.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/28/business/media/28cast.html?adxnnl=1&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1226509268-pcPVeqBDw64e/8tqz9r8fQ" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/28/business/medi...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicolas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:03:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strategy decay in the film industry</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/11/12/strategy-decay-in-the-film-industry/#comment-4456560</link><description>With a dramtic increase in the quality of the video and effects that can be produced in a homebrew way, plus massive online distribution it stands to reason that the movie industry will be impacted by people choosing to do their own thing, find their own heroes, hear good stories not formulaic hollywood hand cranking. &lt;br&gt;Having said that I like hollywood blockbusters and the star culture to some extent. &lt;br&gt;What is really exciting is the truly distributed story, the ongoing narrative that crosses platforms, games, tv, film, ARG. Its by no means easy to create, but having heard Tim Kring talk about the various Heroes story arcs, the intertwining of individual small properties, like cereal packets with the "mothership" of the tv show. Each experience designed to work both on its own, but still add to the narrative.&lt;br&gt;Its exciting and forward thinking entertainment and art for the world we live in now :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">epredator</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:06:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>