<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Equity Kicker - Latest Comments in State of the nation on social networks</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/</link><description>Nic Brisbourne’s view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:42:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: State of the nation on social networks</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/11/18/state-of-the-nation-on-social-networks/#comment-4456585</link><description>James - niche socnets do monetise better, you are right. To generalise on Henry's comment - anything non-comms will generally monetise better, of which niche socnets focused around an interest area are a good example.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nic</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:42:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State of the nation on social networks</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/11/18/state-of-the-nation-on-social-networks/#comment-4456584</link><description>Nic - what about social networks working in a specific vertical like WAYN.  Easier to monetise?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Penman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:50:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State of the nation on social networks</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/11/18/state-of-the-nation-on-social-networks/#comment-4456583</link><description>I agree. The more effective the communication tool the less useful it is for advertising as people are focused on their own communications. MySpace/Bebo are more about sharing "produced"content than Facebook, which why they are probably marginally more effective for advertisers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henry</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:46:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State of the nation on social networks</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/11/18/state-of-the-nation-on-social-networks/#comment-4456582</link><description>Ah, good thought Alan, it might be because it is where friends are, and because you don't need to bother with an address book.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nic</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:27:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State of the nation on social networks</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/11/18/state-of-the-nation-on-social-networks/#comment-4456581</link><description>It'll be like email, the web 1.0 comms system - huge traffic, has to be run as part of a bigger service. I doubt SocNets are technically faster than email though, I suspect its where friends are, so more likely to get a quicker response.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alan p</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:14:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>