<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Equity Kicker - Latest Comments in Reminder &amp;ndash; success equals profits</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/</link><description>Nic Brisbourne’s view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description><atom:link href="https://theequitykicker.disqus.com/reminder_ndash_success_equals_profits/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:35:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Reminder &amp;ndash; success equals profits</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-15961362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Until there are profits, any enterprise is less than a zero sum game. In a buy out, or even in an IPO, losses are passed from one investor to another. It is only when a product/system/service is actually genreating added value can it be successful. Individual investors can be successful - but that would be as a result of some other investor's loss. Only when returns exceed investment is there a real "success"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">martinowen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:35:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder &amp;ndash; success equals profits</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-15872786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;:D&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That warm glow inside is no substitute for a good meal...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brisbourne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder &amp;ndash; success equals profits</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-15872644</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nick - are you sure success isn't just about how many times you can get your business name mentioned at networking events and dinner parties? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philip Wilkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder &amp;ndash; success equals profits</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-15870981</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great point Nic.  One additional axis that may be considered is value creation.  I see companies that turn a profit (spammers, etc.) that can identify an opportunity and go after is aggressively, that end up generating returns to their shareholders.  I find it hard to call them successful.  There needs to be "thick" value for success.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">csertoglu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:29:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder &amp;ndash; success equals profits</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-15869691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great point Nic. A return for shareholders can come in different ways and is not necessarily predicated on profits as you say. Another source of return for shareholders could be a share buyback.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alx Klive</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:24:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>