<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Equity Kicker - Latest Comments in On open social data and (ab)using standards for personal gain</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/</link><description>Nic Brisbourne’s view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description><atom:link href="https://theequitykicker.disqus.com/on_open_social_data_and_abusing_standards_for_personal_gain/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:03:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: On open social data and (ab)using standards for personal gain</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/05/13/on-open-social-data-and-abusing-standards-for-personal-gain/#comment-4456139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dan - Facebook et al might want to be seen to be open to make themselves more attractive to developers.  In a very real sense the socnets are now competing with each other for developers as much as they are for users.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nic</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:03:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On open social data and (ab)using standards for personal gain</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/05/13/on-open-social-data-and-abusing-standards-for-personal-gain/#comment-4456138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't really see any huge "competitive advantage" for sites such as Facebook from "being seen to be open".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The main fear for Facebook comes from remaining closed and self-contained while a competitor such as Myspace becomes a sort of open ID for the web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most likely, Facebook will be in a much stronger position if they are able to establish that cross-web position for themselves, but that's still a risk for them to take. Leaving that risk for Myspace to take is an even bigger risk, however...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Lester</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 05:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On open social data and (ab)using standards for personal gain</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/05/13/on-open-social-data-and-abusing-standards-for-personal-gain/#comment-4456137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google's walled garden is just bigger than everyone else's :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Re OpenWave - well, we all know what happened to WAP - so long as there is an open alternative out there, it will win eventually. Which is why I really would like to see an Open Source Soc Net play.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actually, it may be in the interests of the big infrastructure providers to this drive this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alan p</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 07:59:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>