<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Equity Kicker - Latest Comments in IBM sees the future of online video</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/</link><description>Nic Brisbourne’s view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description><atom:link href="https://theequitykicker.disqus.com/ibm_sees_the_future_of_online_video/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:29:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: IBM sees the future of online video</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/07/ibm-sees-the-future-of-online-video/#comment-4455406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nic, the only problem I see is how much bandwidth the likes of Joost is consuming, there really is only so much data you can shove through a local exchange.  I still think we'll have tv as we know it now, with time schedules, etc, at least for the next 30 years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...and then we have the whole net neutrality debate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mspoke</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:29:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IBM sees the future of online video</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/07/ibm-sees-the-future-of-online-video/#comment-4455405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wicked !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i love the gootube captcha on that one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leafar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:36:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>