<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Equity Kicker - Latest Comments in Future of the music industry</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/</link><description>Nic Brisbourne’s view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description><atom:link href="https://theequitykicker.disqus.com/future_of_the_music_industry/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:41:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Future of the music industry</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/01/29/future-of-the-music-industry/#comment-4455913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Last.fm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Last.fm"&gt;Last.fm&lt;/a&gt;'s announcement is only big news if you've never used &lt;a href="http://imeem.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="imeem.com"&gt;imeem.com&lt;/a&gt; - they've been doing the 'free, on demand, high quality, major label streaming' for over six months&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Furthermore a scientific comparison finds that imeem has a catalog twice the size.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://youngstv.imeem.com/blogs/2008/01/31/_v6jwLC7/a_comparison_of_lastfm_vs_imeem_vs_deezer" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://youngstv.imeem.com/blogs/2008/01/31/_v6jwLC7/a_comparison_of_lastfm_vs_imeem_vs_deezer"&gt;http://youngstv.imeem.com/b...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Gordon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:41:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Future of the music industry</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/01/29/future-of-the-music-industry/#comment-4455912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post, Nic.  I think there's something else going on with the music industry, and it's very sad.  It's the passing of a very long era that has existed since the beginning of recorded music.   Whether we continue with the present "file-based" system, or evolve to a system where "music is like water" pouring endlessly out of the pipes of the internet -- universal access to every track ever recorded -- something much more fundamental is happening.   It used to be that the music industry "found" the best music and "pushed" it out to the public.   Promoters would actually find the most talented and interesting artists and labels would promote those artists.  Think of all the cool artists Malcolm McLaren found in the 70s and 80s, for example.   Who would have known about them if it weren't for someone like Malcolm?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today, by contrast, all the work of finding great new artists is on the individual listener.   True, it's a much more "libertarian" and "decentralized" system, but it's also much harder for the average music consumer these days to sift through millions of tracks and new artists, and locate the best.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only artists who have any real promotional money spent on them these days are the ones who don't need it -- like Britney Spears.   The truly talented gems get little or no promotional investments now, and are never heard from.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe T.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Future of the music industry</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/01/29/future-of-the-music-industry/#comment-4455911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting post on a potential new model &lt;a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/01/a_rare_post_abo.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/01/a_rare_post_abo.html"&gt;http://radar.oreilly.com/ar...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henry Yates</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:02:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Future of the music industry</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/01/29/future-of-the-music-industry/#comment-4455910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice one re Martin, funny.  Paul McG is surely a success given U2 (by the way besides U2 I can think of PJ Harvey, but no one else), but go to the Music Managers Forum if you really want to see to what extent these guys have no clue...  This is a dumb comment  from a great man that is in may ways "back to the future" (reminds me of early days of the RIAA -- let's focus on device based protection huh ?).  So dumb, so predictable, so much more for our startups to do !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred Destin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:18:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Future of the music industry</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/01/29/future-of-the-music-industry/#comment-4455909</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's "Paul McGuinness"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Martin McGuinness is a totally different kettle of fish &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_McGuinness" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_McGuinness"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robin Blandford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>