<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Equity Kicker - Latest Comments in Founder transitions</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/</link><description>Nic Brisbourne’s view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:56:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Founder transitions</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/20/founder-transitions/#comment-4456343</link><description>Good post Nic. We need a lot more open debate on this topic, as it creates a lot unnecessary tension.  At our end of the patch I think it's even more complex, see &lt;a href="http://maxbley.typepad.com/maxs_blog/2008/08/from-founder-to.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://maxbley.typepad.com/maxs_blog/2008/08/fr...&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Max Bleyleben</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Founder transitions</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/20/founder-transitions/#comment-4456341</link><description>Hello Nic,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I work with &lt;a href="http://Newstex.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Newstex.com&lt;/a&gt; and we think your blog might be a good fit for syndication with Newstex.  I tried finding contact info on your blog and saw your info card to e-mail you but could not find your e-mail address.  Please send me a msg. at &lt;a href="mailto:ncelli@newstex.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;ncelli@newstex.com&lt;/a&gt; if you're interested in reviewing our proposal.  Look forward to hearing from you!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;Neccia</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neccia Celli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Founder transitions</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/20/founder-transitions/#comment-4456347</link><description>Hey Henry - great link.  I will add it as an update.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nic</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Founder transitions</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/20/founder-transitions/#comment-4456346</link><description>I liked this bit of advice for founder CEOs...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://cerdafied.typepad.com/cerdafied_voip_mobile_web/2008/07/for-founding-ce.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://cerdafied.typepad.com/cerdafied_voip_mob...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henry yates</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:16:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Founder transitions</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/20/founder-transitions/#comment-4456342</link><description>Possibly. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I imagine it's actually highly specific to the situation, with far too many variables to *know* how you'd react... but when you get onto "I", I'm obvious bias.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:21:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Founder transitions</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/20/founder-transitions/#comment-4456344</link><description>Thanks Dave.  Not everyone looks on it the same way as you though.  It sounds like ego and control/power are not important concepts for you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nic</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:03:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Founder transitions</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/20/founder-transitions/#comment-4456345</link><description>Many I'm being naive, but I just don't "get" this one. As a founder, and acting CEO I look forward to the day I can hand over and step aside, don't get me wrong I love it, but...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A good coders aim is to make himself redundant, always. If what he/she builds is so good they're no longer needed on that problem that's a job well done. You move onto a hopefully harder, and currently unsolved challenge/problem/etc&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, isn't it similar? When a business hits the point where your work on that problem is done. Not to say the problem is solved but your work on it is no longer needed, no longer the right person to have at the helm isn't stepping aside a compliment to you?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:37:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>