<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Equity Kicker - Latest Comments in Facebook is becoming a case study in how not to manage PR</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/</link><description>Nic Brisbourne’s view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description><atom:link href="https://theequitykicker.disqus.com/facebook_is_becoming_a_case_study_in_how_not_to_manage_pr/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:37:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook is becoming a case study in how not to manage PR</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/12/05/facebook-is-becoming-a-case-study-in-how-not-to-manage-pr/#comment-4455838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ironic that the anti-spam word that is showing up now is "MSFT"--given the topic is about privacy and arrogance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;however, this time microsoft looks like a trusted provider compared to the mistakes of facebook and lest we not forget Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is the PR failure at Facebook a function of immaturity or is it something more endemic and therefore more problematic?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kerry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:37:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook is becoming a case study in how not to manage PR</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/12/05/facebook-is-becoming-a-case-study-in-how-not-to-manage-pr/#comment-4455837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Nic....my view tallies with yours - this is sensitive stuff, far more so than user feeds when I can see who is throwing dead sheep at who. In fact, research shows we are often more willing to share our sex lives than our financial ones.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think anyone who studies social nets "gets" that friendship groups run on trust, not utility. I think Facebook confused what they had - friendnets - with the sort of contact nets business people have, and assumed because the "Social Graph" looked the same, it worked the same - which has to make you wonder how well they "grok" the underlying dynamics of social nets (hmmm...I feel a post coming on).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I wrote the stuff a month or so ago it was because I immediately grasped how the system *had* to work (blows own trumpet) and thus could see (especially in the light of the hubris of the "100 Year Revolution" announcement) the likely abuses that a company struggling to make a $15bn valuation could carry out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Re PR...a fortnight ago I was at the NMK event on PR and made a rude comment (or 2) about Facebook's PR - I definitely felt as if I'd farted in church, and was later told by a number of people, in no uncertain terms, that Facebook's PR was the best in the business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If that is so then their tactics of staying shtum are absolutely deliberate, and they have clearly calculated that the storm in a blogcup will blow over. Lets see if it works.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alan p</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 03:45:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>